Yews to Eucalypts

James Stephen Whitehead (1796 -1838) and Ann Maria Stone (1803 – 1879) Kent, England to New Zealand and the Prebble connection. “Canterbury Pioneers”.

James Stephen Whitehead was born 1796 in Willesborough, Kent in England.  He was baptised on the 13th March, 1796 at St Mary’s Church in Willesborough.  This was the family church.  His parents were Stephen Whitehead (1772 – 1852) and Susanna Cook (1771 – 1852).  The records of the day show that there were many Whitehead’s dotted throughout Kent in good number and it is reasonable to assume they had been there for some time.

Anne Maria Stone or Annie as she was known through her life was born in 1803 in Kennington, Kent in England to Jesse Stone and Sarah Tappenden.  She had one brother that I know of, William Stone.  William would spend his entire life in the Charing area of the Kent district of England and raise quite a large family. It is likely at this time that there was a much larger family however current research is ongoing.

James an agricultural labourer married Ann Maria Stone on the 26th April 1826 at the age of 30 in the parish of Charing.  James wife, Ann Maria Stone was born in April 1803 in Kennington. Her parents were Jesse Stone (1786) of Meresham, Kent and Sarah Tappenden (about 1784) of Boughton-Atulph, Kent. Both James and Ann Maria were locals from Kent.   Their children were Ann Maria and James, two children (that I know of.)  Mary Elizabeth Whitehead born 1829 and  James Stephen Whitehead born 1832 in Lyminge, Kent.

James Whitehead and Ann Stone

In the year following their daughters birth there were Whitehead’s who became enmeshed in the first of the ‘swing riots’ in Lyminge.  I found a reference to a James Whitehead (unlikely to be ours unfortunately), a labourer of Lyminge concerning the breaking of Mr. Harmbrook’s machine in the Kent Sessions of October 1830.  James was in court to give his deposition along with another labourer on the same matter a Stephen Knox also of Lyminge.  On Sunday the 29th August 1830, it would appear that this James Whithead took part alongside perhaps forty other men of the area in the breaking of farming machines,  namely in this case Mr. Harmbrook’s machine. It would appear there were also Prebble’s involved in these riots so it is not unreasonable to think that  our James Whitehead and James Prebble were well known to each other. Was this our James Whitehead?  Apparently not at this James was married to a Sarah in Lyminge and our James was married to Ann.  Were they related? Possible. Were they in the same area around the same time yes.  Would our James have known about the local goings on? Reasonably, yes he would have. He was no man of any particular finance himself.

What I would like to draw you to is the most wonderful recounting of the events of that night and the following days and nights and the events that took place in and around the district.  Quite miraculously for nineteenth century England, if not for the leniency of sentencing and fines of Sir Edward Knatchbull the magistrate then it is quite likely that many of the men involved could have gone the way of the Tolpuddle Martyrs.  Those affected and the government of the day were so incensed by Knatchbull’s consideration toward the machine-breakers that the laws were subsequently amended and the sentencing became considerably harsher.  Most of the men who were convicted only spent a few days in jail.  For a rather vivid account I encourage you to read Derek Boughton’s Lyminge Swing Riots.  From 1830 the ‘Swing Riots’ occurred across England.  In fact the riots began in East Kent.  These riots grew from dissatisfaction by the agricultural workers who for many generations had been guaranteed a reasonable living as cottagers and agricultural labourers.  The introduction of machinery such as the threshing machines in agriculture meant that work that had taken many could be done by a few. Loss of employment brought the reality of not being able to make a living. The agricultural workers reacted during the swing riots by acting as mobs and destroying the machines.  They became known as machine breakers.  A crime that was punishable by death and at the very least transportation to Van Dieman’s land.

To further complicate matters unrest and wars in Europe were having an impact in Britain. Three years of poor yield crops and the agricultural worker was being pushed out of his income and his home.  On top of this, the complete reform under the new Whig government of the Poor Laws meant that the poor were becoming indeed the very poor.  This system of poverty was becoming entrenched with little way out.  In many cases families were being pushed from their traditional homes into factories in cities already over-populated. Extreme deprivation now faced this group of people who without proper representation felt disenfranchised and desperate.

The factories offered low wages, no home and usually long hours and sub-standard working conditions. In many cases young children were being pressed into working in these factories to subsidise their families income.  The competition for these jobs gave the factory owners all of the brokering powers.  Overcrowding meant that disease was rife amongst the poorer people.  Drunkenness, crime and violence increased expidentially as did the population.

swing riots

Crime and punishment were harsh and transportation to the colonies did not end until 1868.  Great barques regularly left Britain laden with their human cargo.  The only alternative for the very poor was to go into a work house or poor house. This was considered to be worse than death.  The conditions of the work houses being terrible. In many cases the response to the poor in general was managed in an environment of blame, that the inmates had somehow allowed themselves to fall into this derelict state.

 2024, Photographs taken of streets surrounding churchyard. Ramsgate, Kent, author visit to Ramsgate.

James died September 1838 at the age of 42 and was buried 3 Oct 1838 at St George’s Churchyard, Ramsgate, Thanet District, Kent. . At this time I am uncertain of the reason for his early demise. He left a widow and two small children.

Ann Maria’s story has quite a twist to it.  Within months she had remarried another Kent gentleman, who had a family of his own and was also recently widowed. James Prebble’s wife, Anna-Maria Gurr had died.  (Yes your reading right he married two women with the same name). James Prebble had married his first wife in 1821 and she died in 1837. Their children had been born in Mersham in Kent. James was born in Folkestone in Kent.  I have found references where Ann Maria Stone (Whitehead) also went under the name “Annie”.  

St George’s Churchyard, Ramsgate, Location of grave plot A086 (grassed). (with thanks to Ramsgate Historical Society). No known headstone. 2024 photos taken by author when visiting churchyard. 

 St George’s Churchyard Ramsgate, Kent.

James Prebble (1799 -1877) married Ann Maria Whitehead on the 21st October 1838 in Meresham, Kent.  Whilst he was not an agricultural labourer, indeed he had a trade as a carpenter, it is entirely reasonable to understand that as a result of all of this disharmony in Kent and with the promises and opportunities being offered in opening up New Zealand?  Well when James Prebble saw an opportunity for his family to have a better life? He took it.

James Prebble
James Prebble picture featured on historic information board in town of Prebbleton 2025.

By 1840 James and his children, his new wife and two stepchildren landed in New Zealand with a newborn son John Aurora Prebble.  The Aurora is the name

Aurora

of the ship that brought them to New Zealand. John was born 12 days before they landed.  They sailed to New Zealand as assisted immigrants,. They were the first of the European settlement in what was then Petone (an anglicised mashup of the Maori word for the area they landed) and would  later on when it was moved slightly be renamed as Wellington.  A further child Thomas Prebble was born in 1842.

Petone beach, October 2025. “Port Nicholson”. Authors photographs.

At the age of seven on the 22nd September 1839, James  sailed with his family and new step-relations from Gravesend in England to their new home in far off New Zealand.  In an effort to quickly settle this new land the British Government collaborated with the newly formed New Zealand Company to send free settlers to people the new colony.

The decision was made to not send Convicts to New Zealand.  To date the Maori people of New Zealand had knowledge of the Europeans as roughened sailors and whalers.  Certainly not as settlements of white communities. The relationships between the Maori and the sailors and whalers had largely been convivial. Particularly as the whalers were a transient population and not settlers affecting land ownership.

Departure of the New Zealand Colony, (from the Morning Chronicle), Sat 28 Sept, 1839.

The Directors of this Company, together wit ha vast number of persons interested in the colonization of New Zealand, made an excursion to Gravesend, on Saturday last, for the purpose of inspecting the ships which, under the auspices of the company, have been freighted with emigrants to that distant region, and for the purpose also of transacting other important and interesting business connected with the foundation of the new colony. The Mercury steam-boat was employed for the occasion; and though one of the largest vessels between London and Gravesend, her decks and cabins were completely thronged by the multitude of persons who had been invited, every one of whom had a deep interest in the object of the expedition. The Mercury herself was gayly dressed in the colours of all nations; the red cross of England floating supreme above the rest. An ample awning covered the after-dock; an excellent band of music was stationed in the waist. She left her moorings at Fresh Wharf about one o’clock, and contending the whole distances against adverse tide and wind, reached Gravesend at half-past three. the three ships it was intended to visit – the Adelaide, the Aurora and the Oriental – were moored immediately below the town. As the steamer approached, conspicuous by her colours, the emigrants on board these ships crowded upon deck and received the directors with loud and hearty cheers. The object of the directors upon this occasion was twofold – first, to see that their instructions for the comfort of the emigrants upon the voyage has been rigidly carried into effect; and secondly, as the sanction of the government has been withheld from the undertaking – as the infant colony has been without the aid or protection of the colonial office – as no steps have been taken to secure the administration of English laws upon a soil which Englishmen are to inhabit – as all the hopes which up to the eleventh hour the company had entertained of even a slight recognition from the colonial secretary have been disappointed – under these circumstances, the second object of the directors was to obtain, if not from each of the emigrants, at least from the great body of them a voluntary agreement to a charter or code of laws laying down regulations for the maintenance and order and establishing a machine for the administration of law an the enforcement of justice.  The first ship that the steamer rang along side was the Adelaide. She is a fine vessel and has been admirably fitted for the comfort and convenience of the passengers…..

Later in the article, The emigrants on board the Oriental are of a very superior class. They are chiefly young men and women from twenty to thirty years of age, – the women looking healthy and buxom, the men intelligent and resolute. Here too, are a number of Highlanders, from the estate of the Duke of Sutherland: they are fine, hardy set of fellows, and capable no doubt of fighting their way in any region of the world in which they may be placed. Great care appears to have been taken to secure their comfort. They are clad in one uniform dress, a blue jacket and cap and tartan trousers – every thing upon their backs appears to be perfectly new. The noble duke’s agent, who has accompanied them from Scotland, remains with them until the expedition takes its final departure. Mr G F Young in going through the same ceremony on board the Oriental that had previously been gone through on board the Adelaide addressed himself particularly to this body of men. “I perceive” said he “that there are many here form Scotland. Scotchmen are generally well educated and well informed in the history of their country. Those whom I am addressing will doubtless remember the solemn league and covenant which in a former age was entered into by their countrymen. I now propose to you, the descendants of that firm and inflexible race of men to enter into another solemn league and covenant for the maintenance of social order in the new society of which you are to be the founders. (Cheers). The code of laws was received on board the Oriental and afterward on board the Aurora…

The number of emigrants on board each of these ships is as follows:- Oriental 138, Adelaide 149, Aurora, 148, Duke of Roxburgh, 120, Bengal Merchant, 155, making the total of 704 exclusive of cabin passengers whose number onboard the five shifts amounts to 152….

A considerable number of persons, including agricultural labourers are about to emigrate to New Zealand from the neighbourhoods of Pencarrow, Sir Will. Molesworth being one of the Directors of the New Zealand Land Company. There can be no doubt that ere long, the tide of emigration will flow in that direction with more strength than in any other. the two islands which form New Zealand are about as large as Great Britain, and possess all the natural elements of a great and powerful country..

The ships were chartered to take over 800 souls to establish a colony at what was being very initially called Port Nicholson.  The Aurora was a vessel of 550 tons and she was under the command of Captain Heale.  There were 58 males and 90 females.  They left the London docks at Gravesend on the 18th Septemaber 1839. The Adelaide and Aurora sailed out on the same day.  The Oriental had set sail three days prior.

Onboard were James Prebble aged 40 a carpenter, his new wife Ann Whitehead (nee Stone) aged 36.  James children, Richard Prebble aged 15 employment given as carpenter,  Ann Prebble aged 15 employment given as servant. William Prebble aged 12, Edward Law Prebble aged 10, Mary Elizabeth Prebble aged 7, James Whitehead and  his sister, Mary Elizabeth Whitehead aged 13.

An older son, George Prebble opted to remain in England but eventually did come out with his family. His wife died aboard the journey leaving him with small children however he did later re-marry and join his father’s family in New Zealand.

Twelve days prior to their arrival in New Zealand, James mother and stepfather welcomed a new child to their family.  John Aurora Prebble who was born at sea.  John never enjoyed good health and for many years was cared for by his half sister Mary who later married and became Mrs. Mary Dawson.

Port Nicholson

On the 22nd January 1840  at the age of 8, James and family arrived aboard the Aurora at Port Nicholson in New Zealand. James was one of the new settlers to the fledgling community who began their new lives camping on Petone beach.

James arrival and that of his family and the others onboard marks a fairly substantial day in the European history of New Zealand.  They were the first European ship to arrive at what was then called Port Nicholson or more accurately what the Maori’s had already named Petone (anglicised spelling).  This later became known as Wellington.  Now if you are native of Wellington you will recognise this date as the day that is celebrated each year as Wellington Day!

Two years later in 1842 another brother, Thomas Prebble was born.  He was one of the first Europeans to be born in the infancy of European settled New Zealand.  Over the next ten years the Prebble & Whitehead family established their home in the new pioneering settlement of Port Cooper Plains which was later renamed and now known more famously as Canterbury.  Two of James Prebble’s brothers and their families from England also came and settled in the area.

For some years James and his family worked for other settlers as labourers.  Around 1850 he and his family were able to lease a parcel of land which was known as a ‘run’.  It was here that they grew their livestock population and farmed the land.  The land was known as Run 10.  Over time and as the land became available for purchase the Prebble brothers began buying it up.  Along with other settlers to the area. Eventually the area became known as Prebbles Town which became Prebbletown  and then Prebbleton. The Maori name for the area being Taumata Kuri. Prebbleton was chosen primarily for it’s arable land and ability to successfully grow a variety of food crops and support the growth and farming of livestock.  In particular – sheep.  Prebbleton remains a small town today in the Selwyn district of Canterbury to this day.

1848, a double-wedding celebration:  Wellington Independent Vol IV, 307, 20 Sept 1848.
Married – At Karori on Tuesday the 19th inst, by the Rev. J. Watkin, Wesleyan Minister. Mr. Alex Monk to Miss Ann Maria Prebble; also Mr Richard Prebble to Miss Mary Elizabeth Whitehead, all of that place.

I won’t focus too much on the Prebbles in England and New Zealand here, only because there is already a fabulous amount of information available online written by Prebble descendants. Try here.

Between 1853 and 1864 James Whitehead is listed on the New Zealand electoral rolls as living in the Upper Hutt, Wellington. His occupation listed as Sawyer (a wood-cutter).  On the 3rd August 1854, James married Sophia Shirley at St Peters Church in Wellington.  The church had only been built a few years beforehand in 1848.

St Peters Church Wellington

Let me assure you, if you think the Whitehead’s arrival is only a very small representation in the new colony of New Zealand?  Well they were very productive.  The name Whitehead particularly across the north island is common in the extreme.

Other Whitehead’s of course came from England (even Kent!)  and afar however our one’s were not slow in planting a new crop.  James and Sophia had twelve children.  Eleven of whom reached adulthood.  James sister, Mary Elizabeth Whitehead had six children. They were all Prebbles! In case you are confused?  Mary Elizabeth married her younger step-brother Richard Prebble on September 18th 1848 in Karori Wellington. Both families were of the Wesleyan faith.  They were married by the Rev. J Watkins.  So her step-brother became her husband and her step mother in law was also her mother.  Mary Elizabeth and Richard lived their lives and raised their children in Prebbleton.

I think we can safely draw a line under the relationship between the Prebbles and the Whiteheads and be assured that the family were close and that the  Whitehead children were looked after well by their step-father.  I wonder at reunions did you have to ask whether you were a Prebble or a Whitehead-Prebble?  I did find a reference to a Prebble who’d got in a bit of strife with the law and used Whitehead as his alias.  It didn’t help him  much he still got two years in the nick!

James died in 1877.  Death of an Old Settler – Our readers will learn with regret the death of Mr James Prebble of Prebbleton, which took place on Wednesday evening last.  Mr Prebble was one of our oldest settlers, having arrived in Wellington by the Aurora in 1840.  He came to Canterbury in 1846 and settled in that part of the province which bears his name.  Here he has resided with his family until the time of his death.  Reported in the Press. June 1877.

Ann Maria died 21 March, 1879 and is buried with her second husband James.  The newspaper report read: This day one of the Canterbury Pilgrims, died suddenly at her residence, Prebbleton, yesterday.  The deceased lady has been bedridden for some time. Poverty Bay Herald, 22 March 1879.  The Grey River Argus on the 4th April published;  A very old Canterbury settler, Mrs Prebble of Prebbleton, has died at the age of 78.  The Colonist published on the 22nd March 1879.  Mrs Ann Maria Prebble one of the Canterbury Pilgrims at Prebbleton.  The deceased was 68 years of age.  (yes they had different ages reported). The Press newspaper reported on the 21st March, SUDDEN DEATH: – Mrs Prebble, for many years a resident in Prebbleton, and a very old colonist, died somewhat suddenly at an early hour yesterday morning. She had been bedridden for the last two or three years, but an apparent change caused her friends to send for Dr. Guthrie.  She expired shortly before his arrival. The deceased lady was in her seventy-eighth year.

Ann Maria nee Stone, Whitehead, Prebble is buried in the All Saints Churchyard, 9 Blakes Road, Prebbleton, NZ. (Plot 30).

Now sometimes from a historical point of view headstones are even more awesome than what they first appear.  Pay attention to this one. ‘ James his wife Ann, his son Richard and his wife Mary arrived Aurora’.  James is buried with his son and his wife, her daughter, his step-daughter and she was Richard’s wife and yes they all came to NZ together on the Aurora!  Pretty cool huh.

It was an overcast wet day when I took this photo and there were large trees blocking the light. The way this photograph came out was sheer fluke.
Anna Maria Stone Whitehead Prebble. October 2025, author’s photographs. All Saints Churchyard Prebbleton, Canterbury, NZ.
Photograph of photograph on historical information board taken at Prebbleton Oct 2025 by author.
All Saints Church Prebbleton, October 2025, author’s photographs
Type of homes of early colonial settlers Prebbleton.
Prebbleton Central. October 2025. Author’s photograph